Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/24.215.169.176/Archive

Evidence submitted by SluggoOne
See suspected sock's edit; username indicates a COI violation. Şłџğģő 14:57, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment below confirms COI violation. Şłџğģő  15:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

I am the designated webmaster and coordinator of www.lmghs.org - the information that have been added is neither vandalism nor false. We have no idea who SluggoOne is. Please stop changing our revisions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LMGHS Webmaster (talk • contribs) 15:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Is this actionable? The IP in question got only a single warning, so it seems as if the system is functioning as designed, in that the user registered for an account. I do not see any abuse of multiple accounts, especially since the registered account's first edit was 11 minutes after the IP's last one. —C.Fred (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If you believe the editor's repeated claims to be the school's webmaster, that's all you. I'd think a webmaster wouldn't comment like a 14-year-old. Şłџğģő  15:39, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not the issue here. The issue is whether the user is abusing multiple accounts; I see no evidence of such abuse. Whether the username violates WP:Username policy is another issue entirely; that would get reported to WP:UAA. —C.Fred (talk) 15:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The whole point is, looking at the Goldstein School's edit history, the user appears to have registered a second (likely fake) identity to spoil reverts. That absolutely is a SOCK vio. Şłџğģő  15:49, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * And if the IP had received a 3RR warning, I would have acted on it. This administrator chose not to act based on the absence of such a warning. —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with C. Fred about the edit warring problem. However, I do believe we need confirmation on the identity of the school webmaster. I've blocked the account claiming to be official and asked them to send an e-mail to the volunteer response team. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 19:16, 31 July 2010 (UTC)