Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2605:E000:7D0A:900:173:EE7B:9C62:49F7/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

This is the "known professionally"/"better known as" vandal. Edits on Robby Benson, Paige O'Hara, Brad Garrett and Jodie Foster, to name a few.

Could perhaps a range block be done on some part of the IP '2605:e000:7d0a:900:'? Thanks. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare  ‖ 02:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC) ‖ Ebyabe talk -  Health and Welfare  ‖ 02:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, how could I forget? It's User:Who R U?. The Ginnifer Goodwin edits are a dead giveaway. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel  ‖ 02:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm certain this person is not Who R U?, just very confusing overlap between the two. I'm too lazy to provide diffs but I specifically remember one of WRU?'s ipsocks reverting 2605 and insulting them For example this right here is a WRU? IPsock which is a different range I believe. I think the important distinction to make is that 2605 inserts "known professionally" and WRU? often replaces "known professionally" with "better known by the stage name". Also WRU? usually makes sure to leave a snide edit summary unlike 2605. Either way 2605 is being disruptive as well and I think a rangeblock would be good. Sro23 (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * 2605:e000:7d0a:900::/64 and 172.250.108.192 are Time Warner Cable IPs, and they likely belong to the same cable subscriber. Please compare behavior and merge with Sockpuppet investigations/Who R U? if warranted. Thanks ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think this is . Who R U? was changing "known professionally" to "better known", while this user is doing exactly opposite . I see that you blocked this range for "block evasion". Do you still think it should be merged or can we closed this?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Since this apparently isn't WRU?, and since the disruption has apparently stopped, I'm going to close this. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)