Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/41.130.91.244/Archive

15 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets

*


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I don't say that Nableezy and Tiamut socks of each other.I think this IP is belong to one of them.If it is the case is done to circumvent 1RR restriction on the article Nazareth that currently protected because of the edit war. Here is the diffs
 * 1) The diff of the IP :
 * 2) Nableezy
 * 3) Tiamut, Shrike (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Some new information:This IP probably belongs to Nableezy.He reverted this edit of user:174.21.159.54 and the  user:41.130.91.244 reverted similar edit of the same user --Shrike (talk) 09:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Regarding the pair of reverts listed above, two different editors reverting soapboxing (bordering on racist soapboxing) on two totally different articles (actually, in different namespaces) is hardly evidence of them being socks. Every editor who sees unsupported soapboxing should be reverting it on sight.  Qwyrxian (talk) 12:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't say the reverts were bad.The problem that this IP was used to edit war on Nazareth article.And the only purpose of those two reverts it too show that there is some correlation with user:Nableezy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrike (talk • contribs) 13:46, December 18, 2011‎

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . I can't really see any reason to investigate this further, but does anyone else wish to chime in? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added some new information--Shrike (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I mean, it's possible,I guess - but it could be one of a thousand other editors. Or it could just be an IP that saw something that they didn't like. I don't know, but with only two edits, there's not much to go on. As such I'm closing this for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)