Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/50.207.11.29/Archive

10 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users' edits have been limited solely to repeatedly reverting and reinstating two links on the article The Salvation Army. See examples: and. There was a short period between the last removal of the links and the last reversion of that edit. The new account references the article where the edit war is taking place, and appears to have been created just minutes before the most recent revert. HazhkTalk 16:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Report is a little too shoot from the hip in my opinion. Yes, a CU will likely show the two accounts are related. I received an email from Tsasouth, the web communications manager for the Salvation Army. They want the content they add to remain. Obviously, they don't know Wikipedia and don't know what they are doing. There's no malintent, just lack of Wikipedia savvy and knowledge of policies and guidelines. I have started a discussion on the article talk page that I hope they take part in so this can all be straightened out. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The Tsasouth account has been blocked from editing for edit warring. They were ignoring warnings, which is never acceptable, and discussion has been started at the user's talk page.  Hopefully, they will take part and things can be worked out. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  18:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * To me, this looks like a case where the individual was editing from an IP and then created an account afterwards. There haven't been any IP edits since, so I don't see any attempt at dishonesty here. Mike V • Talk 20:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)