Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/61.245.173.189/Archive

23 December 2014
}


 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

HudsonBreeze

See this diff https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgwhite&diff=prev&oldid=639222756 and then user admits to be a sock. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bgwhite&diff=prev&oldid=639268971

The following users are suspected sock puppets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/61.245.173.116 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/61.245.163.93 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/61.245.163.93

I raised an issue on fair use policy with respect to his image on Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Black_July_1983_Colombo.jpg and left a notice on the uploading user's talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HudsonBreeze&diff=prev&oldid=639212832

Within minutes of doing so user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/61.245.173.189 left a number of messages on another users account and a WP admins account. This particular admin had previously used profanity on me, blocked me while being involved in a dispute see this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eng.M.Bandara#Sri_Lankan_presidential_election.2C_2015 and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_19_December_2014.

Contribution of all 3 users seem to linked.

The user has offended by accusing me of being complicit with extra judicial killings and having 'sri lankan mentality' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Black_July_1983_Colombo.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=639302547

The user has been attempting to disrupt me among admins https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Black_July_1983_Colombo.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=639303056 with groundless and highly prejudicial allegation with respect issues and I raised in a proper manner. -- Eng. M.Bandara -Talk  08:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't see any connection between the IPs and the named account. In addition, the IPs are on a highly dynamic mobile network. It's the same individual, but his or her carrier changes the IP address frequently. I don't see any concerns here. Mike V  •  Talk  20:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)