Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/68.228.81.115/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)
 * (There a whole list of them on the IP talkpages)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is the first time I done this so please forgive if I did something wrong. This user (Based around Hong Kong or whatever VPN software they are using) have been going through articles about cars and changing things such as the segment, the class and layout of the car with sources that we don't know if they are reliable or not, like cars.usnews.com or topspeed.com. Such as changing the Audi A7 Infobox from a 5-door liftback to a 4-door sportback.

He also seem always exasperated and commonly use exclamation marks in their edit summary and try find any source they could find reliable or not. What I didn't like is finding out my edit got reverted by the same person but acting like a another user in supporting them by using another IP. This is been going for a while and I don't really want to end up being in a edit war and instead try and do something about this person.
 * Supporting the "other" about the revert even though it shares the same IP range.
 * Doing the same kind of edit with similar edit summary
 * More edit summaries with the same kind frustrated expression in his edit summary.
 * Similar behaviour on another IP Vauxford (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I could be wrong, but, a Poland-based editor that was recently blocked indefinitely, may be related to the IP sockpuppets above, given the similar attitude towards other editors. - Areaseven (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP's appear highly dynamic, and while they might be related, none has edited in the last five days, and most have not edited for far longer than that. I'm going to close the case for now. Courcelles (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)