Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/72.54.210.49/Archive

Report date February 27 2009, 19:34 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by SNESCDADDON (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

This user is disruptive in both AfD discussions for Joel Warady and Joel Warady Group and the fact of the IP and the username posting Do Not Delete in both discussions leads me to believe possable sockpuppetry. SNESCDADDON (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I did not purposefully use my IP address instead of my username. I was unaware the Wikipedia had logged me out when I made my second comment. Furthermore, just because I am a fan of Joel Warady and believe he and his company are notable enough to be on Wikipedia does not make me "disruptive."Last time I checked, Wikipedia allows disagreement.
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
 * Disagreement is fine. However, at an AFD discussion, it is important that you take great care not to give an appearance of being more than one person, and that if you make more than one comment in the discussion, you ensore that only one is marked keep, with all the others being marked as comment Mayalld (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

I am satisfied that there was no intent to disrupt. Mayalld (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions