Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/75.42.235.62/Archive

25 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Using hidden comments in articles within first few edits, won't say whether he/she has edited previously under another account, editing combatively and uncivilly. Just a gut feeling that this is a blocked or banned user (sorry I don't have more evidence than that at this time). Lhb1239 (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't know who this guy is or why he's developed a hard-on for me but can someone please tell him to stop stalking me and taking out perfectly valid and sourced information for such stupid reasons as "no edit summary"? Which is worse, removing information from articles or dickishly enforcing a "rule" that according to the "rule" itself is not a policy or a guideline? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.235.62 (talk • contribs) 00:03 26 October 2011‎ (UTC)


 * Before this is archived, I thought it best to note that although I don't see any proof of sockpuppetry, the actions of the IP do give the impression that he/she has edited here previously and certainly seems to have a bee in his/her bonnet about Wikipedia. Comments about "Wiki-fascists" don't give me a lot of hope for this editor. --AussieLegend (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you have a registered account in which you are not using on purpose? –MuZemike 06:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm only a clerk but I can say this:. Alexandria  (talk)  17:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Not fishing, my suspicion is almost completely based on behavior - I believe this user is a sockpuppet. You heard it here first (I'm likely not going to be the first or last to say it).  Using hidden comments on his first few edits, edit warring and having a decidedly uncivil attitude from the get go?  Definitely not a new user and likely already blocked.  Honestly, I'm not trying to tie up your time with a frivolous investigation, I think that if you look into this IP, you will find he/she is a sock. Lhb1239 (talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * While it's possible that the IP is a sock or something, I can't figure out who it is. And without that, there's not really any justification for a block. I'm closing for now, but if you happen to figure out who the master is, relist under their name. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Will do. Thanks for your help and advice. Lhb1239 (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)