Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/78.1.13.211/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious case-
 * Interest: All the IPs have interest in the article Mohun Bagan A.C.
 * Edit timings: IP 93.143.76.66 (8-9 June), IP 78.1.13.211 (9-10 June) blocked for 2 weeks and IP 78.0.161.90 (19 June)
 * Edit/edit-summary/comments:
 * IP 78.1.13.211 was blocked for personal attack calling me "fanatic, out of mind, crazy vandal" and absurd comments like "clubs staff is afraid of covid to make some official dinner with tikka or biryani" in their edit summary 1, 2
 * IP 78.0.161.90 in their comment here, reiterated the same personal attack calling me "fanatic" and those absurd comments "clubs and everyone, just awaiting logo and dinner"

In simple words these kind of people are no way healthy for wikipedia community. Simply, the user did not learn anything from its 2 weeks long block.

Case 2: Similarity to the third ip-
 * Ip 78.1.13.211 (blocked)in its edit summary mentioning and suggesting "www.goal.com.....clubs merged, ministy confirmed"
 * IP 78.0.161.90 (obvious sockpuppet from above) in their comment here mentioned similar thing "..indian ministry has confirmed clubs name and all links are on mb page..." and "...either keep one new page with dissolved edits on club's old articles, or pick one of these, with new name..."
 * IP 93.143.76.66 (suspect sockpuppet) in their comment here meantioned similar comment to both the above both ips "www.goal.com....ministry confirmation, name and ownership confirmed" and similar comment like second ip, "...can either rename one page with removed logo, or make separate article, but for sure one of clubs has to be listed as former due to registered name change." Drat8sub (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment for clarification:, by closing are you talking about checkuser thing or whole investigation? Because it's a case of personal attack, calling me fanatic again and again and using talk page or discussion as forum to threaten me of blocking/taking care, its simply stressful. Drat8sub (talk) 13:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * , first two are....they have commented the exact thing, if this is not clear sign then I'm afraid nothing else will be sock puppet. Please read again. Drat8sub (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I would like to await for other admins interventions too. Because, if action not taken, this will be persistent behaviour of attacking me, and a harassment for GOING TO AIV or ANI or SPI. Drat8sub (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's no overlap in the IPs' brief wiki-careers. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , the whole investigation. They're not sockpuppets. Cabayi (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)