Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/78.55.62.254/Archive

Evidence submitted by Ghostofnemo
I don't know if this is the right place to report this. This user has apparently only made four edits. 3 were to the talk page of the same article, without apparently actually leaving any comments on the page, and 1 was to make a harassing comment to me during a dispute they were not a party to at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User_talk:Ghostofnemo_reported_by_User:Cptnono It would appear this person is an experienced Wikipedia editor, even though they have only made 4 edits. They also seem to be familiar with my edits, so I suspect this is a sockpuppet of one of the editors from one of these article pages, or the Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories page:
 * It seems that this can happen in any article Ghostofnemo has an interest in. It happened in Talk:John_F._Kennedy_assassination and Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories. These pages are now filled with repetitive and circular discussions, leading nowhere and wasting the editor's time. It seems several editors found Ghostofnemo to be disruptive. Maybe he needs a tutor or an introduction to constructive wikiediting. 78.55.62.254 (talk) 14:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

It could be this is just someone who forgot to log in, but the edits seem like intentional mischief done anonymously. I could give you a list of suspects, but it would be unsupported by any evidence. Ghostofnemo (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't have any reason to believe this is a block user, just someone doing anonymous mischief. Ghostofnemo (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Sorry, but. There is no supporting evidence of sockpuppetry by a blocked user, and it's basically just a request to look into an IP address. There must be more evidence needed for any checks to possibly be run. –MuZemike 17:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)