Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/79.121.180.134/Archive

09 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trip_Lee&diff=531946211&oldid=530934714
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trip_Lee&diff=532242776&oldid=531962369


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gospel_Gangstaz&diff=528795687&oldid=525880406
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gospel_Gangstaz&diff=532243764&oldid=528815703 Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's the same user editing from two different locations. I'd block both for block evasion, but the original block has expired. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * No block evasion, and no intentional sockpuppetry. He's probably not even aware he had been blocked. If he returns after his newest final warning, he can be reported through normal channels. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)