Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/82.52.165.83/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * IPs

I confirm that these IPs, as well as that above, are all my IPs. I never made unlegitimate use of them. Admins can verify.--82.52.144.60 (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Rather, check the following ones


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both of two have only edits in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Ukraine, as it could be see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.52.165.83 and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/79.20.168.147 FrankCesco26. Both of these accounts are menacing me to report me as a sockpuppet while my case is closed. (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Both the IPs are mine. There's no need of a check-user since I never claimed to be different people (admins will easily verify that I have made a totally legitimate use of my IPs), and my IP is dynamic so I can't control when it changes. Check-user can be requested when someone suspects that the same person manages different accounts claiming to be different persons and, specifically, when such a person uses its different accounts in an unlegitimate way, for example for creating apparent consensus about some issue.
 * Rather, while I never made unlegitimate use of my IPs, I suspect you have been doing so with your accounts. So, let me hijack this check-user request: I suspect that behind the following user accounts there is the same person:
 * User:FrankCesco26;
 * User:Emanuelito martinez (indefinitely banned);
 * User:Jobas.
 * The reason is: 1) all three have been involved in the same type of editing (primarily replacing demographic data in articles about religion with unreliable data from unreliable or less reliable surveys); 2) all three have been active on exactly the same articles, usually just a short time away from each other (for example, in recent hours both FrankCesco and Jobas responded on Talk:Religion in Ukraine); 3) all three can't write proper English.--82.52.144.60 (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Today (31-3), I (I am the same person behind yesterday's IPs) have added a new account to the list, User:Отрок 12, since in the last few hours this user has been engaged in an editing activity that appears oddly similar to that of FrankCesco et al., this time in the article "Religion in Russia".
 * And you are again accusing me... As you can see from here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Emanuelito_martinez/Archive in the last line, me and the user you wrote are ::unrelated, also there is no valid reason accusing me and the User Jobas... You should'ntt accuse someone of being a sockpuppet just because you do not agree with your opinion. This is the mafia! I live in ::Italy and I saw the real mafia but I can assure you that behaviour like yours are worse. Having said this, stop complaining or blaming other people for no reason, and, if you want others to think like you, the best way is to convince them, not trying remove them.--FrankCesco26 (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I should note that I actually agreed with your assessment on the article, rather than Frank's.--Jobas (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Closing with no action.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)