Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/92.63.20.39/Archive

Evidence submitted by Nightscream
User:92.63.20.39 made this February 18 edit, placing sentences inside of section headings. After I left a polite admonishment on his/her talk page, a very similar edit was made today by User:92.37.97.67, in which the same thing was done, this time twice in the article. This IP locator site indicates that both are traced to cities in Slovenia, as seen here and here. Nightscream (talk) 22:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Is it claimed that this is abuse of multiple IP addresses, for example by trying to manufacture a false consensus? Or is it just dynamic addressing and a user who doesn't get it yet? Rhomb (talk) 07:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
doesn't look like sockpuppetry to me, merely an IP user with a very dynamic account, would like another clerk or an admin to run an eye over this, but it can probably be closed (unless the filer suspects that the IPs are being used by someone with a registered account). Regards SpitfireTally-ho! 07:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do here. The range is way too large to block anyway. Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)