Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/93.109.16.154/Archive

24 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Confirmed IP proxy http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/216.151.180.196 Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed IP proxy http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/216.151.180.207 Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * From Talk:Land reform in North Vietnam, a talk page that has basically not been edited at all since 2008, suddenly all 3 of these IPs have an opinion, and the same opinion at that:
 * 216.151.180.196 adds a section criticizing the article;
 * 93.109.16.154 adds more criticism, but also edits the comment above for stronger emphasis;
 * 216.151.180.207 responds supporting the critical view of the article.
 * Seems possible (I don't know about likely) that one user is using an IP proxy to make it seem like there is more support for their POV than there really is. That is an WP:ILLEGITimate use of alternate accounts. However, it could just be that they're on an IP that rotates frequently, so I guess it comes down to what you think their intent is. I don't think there's a clear case that they're deliberately misusing multiple IPs. Ivanvector (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with . Anyway, those IPs stopped editing, and I don't see new IPs at affected articles. Time to close this with no action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  08:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)