Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:QUACK. Clearly created to evade a block for edit warring.

Overlap on relatively obscure articles: Talk:Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, Fringe theories/Noticeboard, Talk:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory, and Talk:Hunter Biden.

For race and intelligence topics, the editors has been recycling the same attempts to promote a WP:FRINGE view of scientific racism based on poorly-summarized primary sources. Compare these edits to this one or any talk comments by the IP.

This edit from Oea the King edits their comment to remove reference to "Saini", Angela Saini is the author of a book which was also edited by the IP:

Both IP and account seem confused about what WP:BIAS links to:  etc.

This comment and this edit summary suggest possible proxy use. It is also precocious to claim to know where another IP is located. The Account also posted an edit warring notice, which suggests prior familiarity. Grayfell (talk) 21:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh, also, both the account and the IP seem to think I am obligated keep their "debate" in favor of scientific racism on my talk page: ,,, and ,
 * Grayfell (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The accusation seems to be that I agree with a user and that when accused of being an anon IP I looked up where the IP was. This seems insane. I am not perfect but this user has a grudge, not evidence. Oea the King (talk) 21:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They actually have pretty rock-solid evidence, somehow an IP editor gets blocked and almost right away, a registered account starts making the same type of edits to the same pages. Also the fact that both you and the IP have engaged with this editor...the possibility of that being a coincidence is the same possibility as finding a needle in a haystack when you don’t even know you’re looking for a needle, next to 0%. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 21:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Different person, different country, same hacks. Oea the King (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you can prove that, then the case might be dropped. Until then, you’re evading a block. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 21:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Before I saw Greyfells SPI, I had thought WP:QUACK when saw this users edits also. NZFC  (talk) (cont)  21:55, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Same!! Btw it’s Grayfells, but no need to squabble over little details. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Bugger was trying to remember which way it was spelt but doing it from mobile. NZFC  (talk) (cont)  22:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hahaha rip!!! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The shared misunderstanding of what "WP:Bias" means tipped me off that something was up. I would have filed an SPI if someone else hadn't first. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌ and  for one month for block evasion, based on behavioral evidence. Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger   talk   14:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)