Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/98.5% Chimpanzee/Archive

11 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pattern vandalism at Rejuvenation Research. Not 100% sure, but should be WP:DUCK. Ham tech  person  23:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Definitely not sure CheckUser is required. It's really obvious that they're the same person. The IP has since been blocked for edit-warring.  City O f  Silver  00:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Checkusers do not usually link named accounts to IP addresses. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Bumped the block up to 8 days for block evasion. Closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 13:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

12 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account has just appeared editing the same articles BEST2 and Rejuvenation Research as 98.5%, which seem to have no direct connection to each other. The account is pushing the same sort of edits; trying to get rid of any mention that Rej Research is fringe. Checkuser requested to confirm reasonable suspicions. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looking at his contribs, first edit was to make his user page a blue link. First article edit was to edit Rejuvenation Research, same as IP and Chimp.  Chimp also worked on BEST2  and this article only.  Additionally, Mr. T first came in to essentially restore Chimps edits .  Actually, this is ducky enough to indef block as an obvious sock without a CU, and I have.  I can't quite justify a CU to look for sleepers at this point.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 16:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

12 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock account of blocked user created today and continuing editwar conducted ny previous socks, complete with incivil personal attacks against users that disagreed with them:, , and.

Request that all accounts be blocked indefinitely, together with IP addresses from which they originate, for continued socking after being blocked for socking. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked the newest sock, protected the article, and indefinitely blocked the master. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If another pops up, we may need to ask for a sleeper check. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 18:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

16 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The editor is back again (see previous cases),. Clearly the same guy continuing the exact same discussion as all the previous socks. No checkuser needed, obvious DUCK. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC) IRWolfie- (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It might be worth admin protecting the article; it looks like the editor is waiting out being autoconfirmed with this sock. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The next sock has arrived. Obvious sock: . IRWolfie- (talk) 02:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * for sleeper check since we have whacked a lot of these lately, per my previous SPI comments. Same interest in Rejuvenation Research and similar subjects.  I notice they didn't blue link their pages this time after I made a note of it the other day, so they seem to be reading their own SPI pages.  Ducky enough to block.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the second sock listed above. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  08:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * No shockers here. Closing as it looks like RE cleaned up. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 14:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)