Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A.K.Nole/Archive

15 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Again tidying up some loose ends as part of the pending LTA case against User:Echigo mole. Mathsci has proposed the case against these users but it has never been formally resolved
 * It is a problem of wikistalking and related editors finding their way to obscure articles. I think three probable socks of A.K.Nole/Echigo mole have edited Chateau of Vauvenargues: Junior Wrangler, Penny Birch (with a 2 year gap) and Silver starfish. It is an obscure article which nobody would normally find.


 * Penny Birch's edits to the Chateau of Vauvenargues were problematic because of the timing. They followed edits by . A.K.Nole, one of Echigo mole's first accounts, and the other participants (Groomtech and Kenilworth Terrace) in User:The Wiki House wrote several articles related to Cheltenham and the University of Gloucestershire. Penny Birch too. The first editor on C. of V. was who because of his first and third edits and low level mathematics contributions, fits the pattern of A.K.Nole/Echigo mole. He created Spirella (disambiguation) adding the Spirella Building in Letchworth (see below).


 * But as far as the editors are concerned, the circumstanstial evidence is strong. The similarity between the names and Gustave de Zarbouble cannot be an accident. Nor between  and Guozbongleur. The two blocked sockpuppets that interrupted the SPI diverted attention from the edits of . The two articles that were visited by many of the editors concerned were
 * Beyond Vaudeville (Nellie Seamonster, Caderousse, ipsock 94.197.232.71)
 * List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles {Silver starfish, Nellie Seamonster, Kenilworth Terrace, A.K.Nole/The WikiHouse) as the first blocked sockpuppets pointed out at the SPI report, somewhat redundantly. But, as Echigo mole, they also knew about other hoaxes such as the Letchworth Corset Riot, created by, which linked to the Spirella Building. The use of Baldock in Robert de Baldoque and the deleted Baldock Beer Disaster mentioned by the sockpuppet is unlikely to be a coincidence.
 * List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles {Silver starfish, Nellie Seamonster, Kenilworth Terrace, A.K.Nole/The WikiHouse) as the first blocked sockpuppets pointed out at the SPI report, somewhat redundantly. But, as Echigo mole, they also knew about other hoaxes such as the Letchworth Corset Riot, created by, which linked to the Spirella Building. The use of Baldock in Robert de Baldoque and the deleted Baldock Beer Disaster mentioned by the sockpuppet is unlikely to be a coincidence.

I&#39;m sorry about your trousers (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This checkuser request is a trolling stunt by Echigo mole. is beyond any doubt a sockpuppet of Echigo mole. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole. Echigo mole's posting of CU requests  and  is part of his own trolling to waste CU's time (the actual sock account discovered by Nishkid64 was  as another editor has pointed out). His trolling here is part of his childish game to recount parts of his own past socking history (the email conversations he had with Shell Kinney when he confirmed as Quotient group that he had edited as A.K.Nole and promised to desists from being a trolling wikihounder). Much of the content above is copy-pasting from comments I've made. This is just time-wasting trolling by a community-banned editor. Echigo mole's self-delusion seems to have peaked here as he trolls about the "pending LTA case". If it existed, that would just be a page to detail his own tiresome  trolling and disruption. As, Echigo mole lied in an unblock request. I'm sorry about your trousers seems to have made a similar misrepresentation when the account was block by Amalthea. Another sockpuppet account, , created just recently, changed the checkuser tag here to "yes" and left messages on several user talk pages. Mathsci (talk) 07:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * So is Mathsci saying he was wrong in the accusations quoted above? Or that he was right but for some reason he does not want to have them investigated?  Does he stand by his accusations, or does he wish to retract them?  Sansodor (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)  WP:DENY - trolling by self-admitted sockpuppet of Echigo moleMathsci (talk) 10:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing; report apparently filed by a troll sock. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)