Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ACM7/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * The IP has removed material from Allen Meadors in the same way that (currently blocked for edit warring) has been. Here, the IP states "As i mentioned in my previous reply...", referring back to a comment by Pointer22.  has recently popped up there too. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Added per comment below. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Both Pointer 22, here, and ACM7, here, have copied exactly the same comment by ACM7, as well as my reply, from User talk:Cordless Larry to their user talk pages. That's a pretty distinctive thing to do. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Compare also use of "we" by both ACM7 and by Pointer22. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding, as this looks like block evasion. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * And then there's this. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The information added to this Wikipedia page was from editorials which did not seek valid information but used slanted reports by one particular news woman. We request that these misleading editorial references be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * . Who is "we"? Are you coordinating your activities? Someguy1221 (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

The "we" represent seven UCA alums who feel that Dr. Meadors and his parents were victims of a zealous reporter and since he no longer lives in the area, we try to put truth forward when we read something that is misleading regarding his Presidency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This isn't the place to discuss the content of the article (the correct place is Talk:Allen Meadors), but just to note that Meadors pleaded guilty to a criminal charge, so it is difficult to see how this is just about an over-zealous reporter. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note also that shared accounts are prohibited, as explained at WP:NOSHARING. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack goes the duck. Primefac (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Quack: "To answer the question put us, we had to have someone else open an account". Cordless Larry (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack goes the sock. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. I've semi-protected the article and Talk pages for one week. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * is also ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , user marked as banned via WP:3X – requesting checkuser as all previous investigations have been technical, and a CU might want to have a look at this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Previous accounts are all quite stale, but this account matches one of the IP ranges that was checked previously, so . No additional accounts visible. ST47 (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)