Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ADGWrigley/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

What these accounts all have in common is trying to push through Draft:David Wrigley and David Wrigley (doctor). This is a little odd because he is actually notable. But sockpuppetry is sockpuppetry.

ADGWrigley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ADGWrigley

Dgwrigley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dgwrigley

86.160.38.24 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * For a litany of reasons, CU isn't going to be helpful here -- Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  04:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like these are all the same person (or closely associated).  I do not see anything abusive about the way the accounts are acting.  No one is trying mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt; to create the illusion of greater support for a position; to stir up controversy; or to circumvent a block, ban, or sanction. They are all editing to make the article better and using usernames that show they are connected.  This should be closed with no action.  Also the Master should probably be switched to  as the account was created 23 May 15 and  was created 13 Oct 16.   - GB fan 13:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I concur with GB fan, these accounts are clearly connected to the point of disclosure being implied, and as such there's no violation of the policy here. The best we can do here is advise the user to stick to one account, which I'll do. Since there's no finding I'm disinclined to move the case, unless another clerk wants to. Closing with no further action. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)