Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ASUS668/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Suspicious SPA activity at Articles for deletion/Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak in Tychy, with two SPAs casting votes supporting a mostly-SPA primary account The first two accounts have an identical name patter (Polish name + 4 digits), the third one is somewhat similar, and the first two also collaborated as mostly SPAs at pl wiki. At related Polish discussion (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2022:05:30:Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach) a Polish admin noted similar topics were edited in similar way by socks related to (stale). Might be worth checking if someone is not up to old bad tricks (incuding double/triple voting at XfD). PS. See also report on cross-wiki spam at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Muzeum_Miniaturowej_Sztuki_Profesjonalnej_Henryk_Jan_Dominiak_w_Tychach Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - the apparent votestacking + username similarity is enough to raise suspicions. Please CU to confirm. ASUS668 is the oldest account, but I'll hold off on moving the case until CU results are in. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 22:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Alicja2891 is ✅ to ASUS668. That pair is only  to Krzysiek2224; a behavioral block is not out of the question, but it would need to be really strong evidence. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Krzysiek2224 seems to be mostly focused on promoting Lucjan Pajdzik and that museum on various wikis; the other two share that cross-wiki interest (cf. e.g. ), so they're pretty obviously related to the promotional endeavour in some way – whether they're the same person strikes me as immaterial. Blocking Krzysiek for a mix between advertising and socking, and the other two for socking to votestack in support of Krzysiek. Don't think they need tagging. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
was blocked for SPA/possible socking and the current re-creation of the museum article has been solely edited by these three, showing the same promotional focus. Droon has also edited on an artist connected with the museum, and he did not address COI concerns raised then. Clearly meatpuppetry if not socking. Star  Mississippi  13:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'd put it right around a weak, along with who's worth mentioning. There's certainly some odd patterns though, both in the technical data and in the edits. I'd like to try and solve this diplomatically  do you have any relation to each other? Or perhaps a conflict of interest with the museum? DatGuyTalkContribs 16:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @DatGuy I'd forgotten about this SPI entirely. I gave Eretazm a cautionary welcome this morning for the same reasons, but none of them have used a Talk. Star   Mississippi  03:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Behavioral evidence shows they could be separate people, though they probably do have a COI with respect to the museum. All editors are inactive, no blocks needed currently but if they resume promotion/disruption that could be handled the usual way. The Wordsmith Talk to me 00:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)