Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AZConvene/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
it appears that warren has picked up where Nina left off, gamed for AC and then moved Draft:Azeus Systems Convene to mainspace. See also Draft:Azeus Systems Holdings Ltd., Draft:Azeus Convene, Azeus Systems PICKLEDICAE🥒 10:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm comparing Draft:Azeus Convene by NinaLyons to Draft:Azeus Systems Convene by Warrenwillis. The text has been trimmed a bit but is largely identical, indicating either a sock or a WP:MEAT UPE. - please indef Warrenwillis as a suspected sock of NinaLyons. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 05:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * --Blablubbs (talk) 09:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * appears to be an earlier sockmaster. Perhaps a clerk would like to move this case to that name. JBW (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * JBW - ✅. Reset status back to 'close'.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * following move. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Brand new account, making the 10 necessary edits and then creates the same article with new title, Azeus Group Of Companies. Fram (talk) 08:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @RoySmith, why? It's a block evading account continuing with the promotion of the same company but under a different title, what more do they need to do to warrant a block? Fram (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, you meant no block yet for ChrisZhang8, no issue there, I misunderstood. Fram (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I've updated my comment to clarify that, thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Quacking loudly. - Please compare the accounts. --Jack Frost (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * These three are all ✅ to each other:  In addition,  is ✅ but I don't see enough actual activity from ChrisZhang8 to justify a block. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * this is a good example of what I was talking about recently where you might want to dual-tag. We've got a bunch of accounts that are confirmed to each other, but we've lost the chain of non-stale CU data to confirm them back to the master.  Could you please do that tagging here? -- RoySmith (talk) 13:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Tagged as suspected to AZConvene, and confirmed to NinaLyons. MarioGom (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Nothing left to do here. . --Jack Frost (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)