Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aafakhravar/Archive

03 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

(1) The user "Aafakhravar" relates to the subject Amir-Abbas Fakhravar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amir-Abbas_Fakhravar#Page_Protection). Aafakhravar was actively involved in editing the subject's page with information that was favorable to the subject. Once it was determined that Aafakhravar is the subject, Aafakhravar contributions to that page were flagged for POV concerns. From that moment, the user Siavash777 was created. That user's edits, like Aafakhravar, exclusively relate to promoting the subject. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Siavash777). Since Siavash777's creation, Aafakhravar's username has been completely inactive.

(2) "Siavash" is Amir-Abbas Fakhravar's pseudonym as reflected on his own personal website (http://fakhravar.com/).

(3) Siavash777 makes the same spelling and grammatical mistakes as "Aafakhravar". For instance, both spell the word "nonsense" as "non-sence" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amir-Abbas_Fakhravar. Here's another comparison. After making an edit to the subject's page "Aafakhravar" comments "I am adding Fakhravar's Important activity to Fakhravar's page". A few months later when "Siavash777" makes another edit to the subject's page he comments "I am adding the parts which has enough facts and resources and were deleted by Vandalizing activities." The tone of both sentences is the same. The grammatical mistakes (improper capitalization) is also repeated in both examples. That comparison can be found here: http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/UserCompare/Aafakhravar.html. Kabirat (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Aafakhravar is . This will have to be decided on behaviour alone. WilliamH (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing any abuse here. If anything, this is a forgotten password. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)