Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aawjgnekr/Archive

17 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Recreated the hoax page Controlisable which was first created by Aawjgnekr. Here asked about the deletion of Chase Oliver, which was created by Aawjgnekr. bonadea contributions talk 17:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Pretty likely, but a check would confirm it not being meatpuppetry. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Additionally, is ✅.  Tiptoety  talk 02:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Users blocked, closing. Nakon  03:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

05 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Created Controlisable, Bubra and Chase oliver, all of which have been previously created by Aawjgnekr and the previous sock puppet User:Netgerr (sse deletion history for Chase Oliver). bonadea contributions talk 11:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Looking at the editing histories of the accounts this is a duck. Blocked and tagged. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Aawjgnekr Junior
Recreated the attack page Chase oliver(Difference between capitalization), of which Aawjgnekr and other suspected sockpuppets created. Here Revandalized Stonewall Jackson with a similar edit as to Aawjgnekr's AlfredoRego (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC).

Freddyfreak1997
Recreated the hoax Controlisable which Aawjgnekr, Netgerr, and other socks and suspected sockpuppets have created. AlfredoRego (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC).

Comments by other users
Both ducks. Blocked and tagged both, as well as. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 03:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

01 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

See User:Freddyfreak1997, User:Freddyfreak1998, User:Freddyfreak1999. Man way  09:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, along with. TN X Man 13:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Both have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

30 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of hoax article Controlisable, User:Chase Oliver is connected based on the inclusion in the hoax article, and Freak5Figgle editing the user page. Monty 845  16:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, along with some other accounts I've blocked and tagged. TN X Man 18:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

04 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Atterion has an admitted COI as a member of the family associated with NRHP registered house Green Leaves. There has been much to-ing and fro-ing with their edits and this has culminated in Atterion filing a hopeless AfD Articles_for_deletion/Green_Leaves.

The AfD is misguided, probably malicious borne of of frustration and is certain to fail due to inherent notability. Within moments of filing there were two newly registered contributors supporting the proposed deletion and using the same COI-based arguments as had been deployed by Atterion in editing the article. Sitush (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All three are ✅ matches to each other. TN X Man 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * User:DeltaQuad blocked the two socks indefinitely; I have blocked the master (Atterion) for one week. However, I am asking for a block review on WP:AN for my block as its the first time I've made a block of this type. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The block is fine. Closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

12 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I have just had a completely bizarre NPA & EW warning on my talk page from the alleged sock, followed three minutes later by a message from Atterion, who is just off a block for socking and refers to it. Heck of a coincidence given the past recent history between myself and Atterion. Sitush (talk) 00:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * And straight after Atterion's post on my TP, they (Atterion) went to Green Leaves and again removed valid, cited information. - Sitush (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm endorsing for confirmation - but also to see if this is related to, a confirmed sock of User:Aawjgnekr. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Whichever one this turns out to be a sock of (its interest in "archiving", and creation of malicious redirects, certainly looks suspicious to me), it would probably be good to run a sleeper check of the master, as this account has been around since June so there may well be more. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN X Man 13:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged all socks, gave the master indef. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as a procedural note, this case was previously open with Atterion as the master. Since there's a confirmed connection to Aawjgnekr, I've merged the case to show them as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged all socks, gave the master indef. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as a procedural note, this case was previously open with Atterion as the master. Since there's a confirmed connection to Aawjgnekr, I've merged the case to show them as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged all socks, gave the master indef. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as a procedural note, this case was previously open with Atterion as the master. Since there's a confirmed connection to Aawjgnekr, I've merged the case to show them as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged all socks, gave the master indef. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as a procedural note, this case was previously open with Atterion as the master. Since there's a confirmed connection to Aawjgnekr, I've merged the case to show them as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as a procedural note, this case was previously open with Atterion as the master. Since there's a confirmed connection to Aawjgnekr, I've merged the case to show them as the master, and I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

02 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Duck test: messing with an archived copy of a relevant AfD discussion and expressing concern with the personal reputation of one of Aawjgnekr's socks. I've blocked the IP for a week; this is really FYI. Drmies (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP already blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)