Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbCaesar/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pretty straightforward. AbCaesar who kept adding himself to List of books written by children or teenagers until receiving a final warning on July 22. The next day, Gjbabloo became and started make the same edits example here. The editor was also able to quickly find his way to Draft:Deependra Tiwari, created by AbCaesar, and make improvements to it. GPL93 (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's obvious these are the same person, but I'm in a AGF mood this morning, so I just dropped uw-agf-sock on both of their talk pages and I'll leave it at that. If this keeps up, please create a new report and ping me to it, at which point the AGF well will have run completely dry. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Promoting himself on lists of authors and here  and repeatedly recreating his autobiography. AbCaesar has self-declared as being the subject being promoted. Gjbabloo switched to AbCaesar immediately after I warned him. Both edit from mobile devices. Both created on the same day. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've moved the case to the oldest account's name. This happens to already exist. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 09:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * These accounts were linked by in a previous SPI report in the archive for this page. They noted that they were assuming good faith that time, but further times they wouldn't AGF. I agree with RoySmith in this case, and thus  both accounts indef. The are both SPAs over a topic they are directly connected to and are using sockpuppets disruptively. I have indef blocked the master, as indef blocks are not necessarily forever and a well thought out appeal can lead to unblocking. Also an indef block should get their attention so that they can understand why their edits and use of a sockpuppet has been disruptive. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 09:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)