Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abdou009xx/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Edits at Fennec fox UtherSRG (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, I'm going to be honest here, these accounts look pretty different to me. We need to meet a certain threshold of evidence to have reasonable grounds to run CU. Looking at these two accounts, on the one hand we have an editor who never uses edit summaries, uses the visual editor, and is exceedingly preoccupied with the equipment used by the Moroccan army; on the other, we have someone who uses the mobile app, and who always leaves an edit summary in French. They only intersect at one article, about a type of fox. I'm not seeing evidence of socking here - is there something I'm missing?  Girth Summit  (blether)  20:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The singular intersection is where I'm sitting. They both made the same edits that more experienced editors on this topic have undone. Perhaps a meat puppet and not a sock? "Hey fren... I'm having trouble getting these bozos to accept my incorrect edit. Can you do it for me?" is what is probably happening. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * And while I don't want to spam y'all CUers, I'd prefer to err on the side of caution... UtherSRG (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can understand the abundance of caution, but with only four edits I'm inclined to give them a pass. Let's keep an eye on them and pick it up if there's any more overlap that looks sketchy. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  21:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)