Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abdulaziz999982/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

GABgab 01:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, in Sockpuppet investigations/Deanarthurl. GABgab 01:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

There were some similarities of this user contributions from the sockmaster, especially on Indonesian sportspeople related articles. Stvbastian (talk) 02:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, do you have an specific examples (diffs) of the similarities you noticed? The SandDoctor  Talk 04:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Adding incorrect and in my opinion quite possibly deliberately misleading Infobox-s - "" in this particular case - would appear to me indicative of a refusal to comply with en.wp expectaions. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 11:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The article Syuci Indriani was initially created by Azizabdouls1 in 2019
 * In 2021 it was re-created by Aziz7247 and in the current version of the article would version appear substantially enough similar to the deleted article to to possibly a candidate for WP:G5 speedy deletion.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I know I declined this earlier, but I came back and took a deeper look at the behavioral evidence. That led me to start combing the CU logs, which unearthed enough to convince me it was worth doing a check.  Based on the current CU data vs what I dug out of the logs, I'd say Aziz7247 is  to several previous accounts, and the behavioral evidence was enough to convince me that a block with suspected tag was warranted. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Creating user page linking to Wikipedia articles. (Indonesian sportspeople related articles). Stvbastian (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Bit of an odd one. I'm going to say that is ✅ to, the following accounts:
 * This group is technically very to the following group (which are ✅ to one another):
 * Given the similarities in ediitng, I'm going to block and tag as confirmed. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This group is technically very to the following group (which are ✅ to one another):
 * Given the similarities in ediitng, I'm going to block and tag as confirmed. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the similarities in ediitng, I'm going to block and tag as confirmed. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the similarities in ediitng, I'm going to block and tag as confirmed. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I saw the possible connection when I blocked Addbot899, but I guess I must've got distracted and forgot to pursue it further. My bad, good catch, etc. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Although they have mostly edited constructively, sockpuppetry is not a write thing to do. I'm certain they are Abdulaziz999982. zoglophie 20:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * OK - based on current CU data, I'd say that is ✅ to, who is currently blocked as a sock of . The CU logs show that old Abdulaziz999982 socks geolocate to the same country, sometimes the same city, as Abdaz0702 socks, and they seem to have very similar editing interests = I think these cases need to be merged.  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * - I've blocked without tags. Please merge the Abdaz0702 case into this one, and tag accordingly. Cheers  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Abdaz0702 case merged here and retagged —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
See:, and. The style of the list just like the sockmaster did, and their contribution same with sockmaster (only to Indonesian sportspeople related article). Stvbastian (talk) 14:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Mmm, not a clerk or CU but I don't think we can use checkuser to link IP addresses to accounts. I see that all the IPv6 addresses are subject to the same range-partial block but I didn't perlustrate Special:Contributions/2001:448A:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 to tell whether bumping it to a full block is reasonable, and what little I checked isn't unambiguous. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * - Jo-Jo Eumerus is correct, we cannot run CU to connect an account to an IP. Also, today I learned the word "perlustrate". Spicy (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Some IPs are blocked, the reast are . Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)