Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishek191288/Archive

11 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Users have both been blocked for making nearly identical comments: ,, though it is possible that Gamblatt simply copied the first user's comments. Abhishek191288 is asking to be unblocked; would like to determine whether CU evidence suggests lifting or keeping the block. OhNo itsJamie Talk Abhishek claims that  User:Sreerajarasa created the sockpuppet (not sure what that's based on). 18:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The duck evidence here is fairly strong, but as the user has denied owning the accounts, I think CU is needed to clear it up. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * and are  matches. Gamblatt is ❌.  TN X Man  20:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked both accounts.  Nakon  01:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Per this discussion, I've unblocked Abhishek191288 and Sreerajarasa. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

09 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Please note that users Abhishek191288 and Holenarasipura are moving pages in a coordinated way. Both are sock suspects are changing article names to make them sound as if they are written in their regional language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Holenarasipura https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Abhishek191288&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bankapura_Peacock_Sanctuary&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nagareshvara_Temple,_Bankapura&action=history |*| Anand.Hegde |*|Talk to me 18:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * If there is someone who is socking, it is you and I can hear a loud quack in that link. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 17:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Your allegations are baseless and what you are hearing (a loud quack) is a noise. If you are particular about duck test, then perform it on the right kind of audience. Start scrutinizing my edits and my participation in discussions, you will know the truth |*| Anand.Hegde |*|Talk to me 17:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * My allegations are not baseless. I'm sure per checkuser, it iwll prove my point. It is your allegations that are baseless. You just want editors who have opined against you with some content to be blocked considering them socks. Why don't you add Imc as well in the list! LOL! Better do your homework properly and come back! The truth lies right in front us. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Let's not get into altercations and waste each other's time. Should you suspect my contributions, you should initiate investigations and let admins arrive at a decision on who is involved in Sock Puppetry. As for Imc, I have closely followed his edits and I do not believe that he is a sock suspect. The only complaint I have about Imc is his tendency to overgeneralize the names of places in Karnataka and following expansionist attitude towards implementing the naming pattern followed in Old Mysore area to the rest of Karnataka without considering the sentiments of people from the other region. Everybody has at least one opinion. So let’s not opine about a subject where we have limited knowledge about that topic.  I will not be responding to anymore messages on this page and leave it to admins. |*| Anand.Hegde |*|Talk to me 16:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The only two pages where these two accounts have edited in close proximity both relate to a dispute over the name between Bankapur and Bankapura; if they are both from the same region, it is not surprising they would agree.  unless you have any further diffs of collaboration or attempts to influence consensus, I don't see enough evidence to declare wrongdoing. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Not enough info was given to run a check or make a block. More info was requested 15 days ago and was never provided. hasn't edited since 14 May. I am closing this without any bias against reopening it if more information emerges.  Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  05:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)