Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishek4889/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Master's first three edits were editing RjSherazAhmad's user page and user Rahulnnd6 was registered a couple of days back and his first edit was repeating master's work at Raj Purohit and used the image (File:Raj Purohit Director.jpg) which was uploaded by the master in commons. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * for all except RjSherazAhmad who has not edited in over a year. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other and to the master :
 * Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

L3X1 (distant write)  12:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I recognize that the ediotr is already indeffed, however, it is not connected to sockpuppetry. L3X1 (distant write)  12:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of Paras Singh Minhas under different title Paras singh minhas and the user confirmed himself as the manager of the subject. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
to confirm socking. The only non-stale account in the archive is. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  01:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * .--Bbb23 (talk) 23:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The text of the articles are different enough to be by a different hand. I have left a COI notice on the user's talk page. Closing.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Possible duck. SufiGulati's last edit was in June 2016 and reappeared in 2018, two months after when Pradeep K Sharma was deleted and his first edit after two years gap was to recreate it under Draft:Pradeep K Sharma (Film Producer). He also recreated Jack & Dil under Jack and Dil and both articles were created by their previous sock. GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Just notice Sudhanshu6454's first three edits on Sufi Gulati created by the suspected sock connects them. GSS (talk |c|em ) 06:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Adding Er.rohit01raj who is using the same IP as SufiGulati as per the CU result here and whose article Draft:Tikli And Laxmi Bomb was created by SG in mainsapce under Tikli and Laxmi Bomb. GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:07, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is confirmed to match and .  Er.rohit01raj is stale, but fairly obvious.  Going to hand out some blocks now. Courcelles (talk) 01:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I've blocked everyone involved. Case closed. Courcelles (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See DK Films, this is probably meat puppetry but only people who have ever written about DK Films so far have been socks, so... Praxidicae (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh and there is this too which previously was Clince Varghese. Praxidicae (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And to make it easier, see . Praxidicae (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * See also response below about WP:UPE and same mannerisms as Iamzine13 (see last two unblock requests.) + apparent copying of sigs. Praxidicae (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * webhost and likely editing logged out (see contribs to my talk etc...) Praxidicae (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm not a sock of anyone, I removed your proposed deletion so you're attacking me, but I removed in policies gave an explanation you did not like it you submitted it for Article for deletion, I simply gave my reply. seriously man doing something good is not today's thing I have nothing to do with the DK films go ahead and delete it I don't care about that. I'm done now -_- -- 👀Chris FredErick ⚽️ Talk ❤️ 19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no attack, there's a clear pattern of behavior that matches past accounts. Can you explain your recreation of multiple articles that this user created? Your account is clearly not new given your extensive use of more advance tools that most beginners would not know about and the fact that you've recreated at least two articles from this master. Also, I didn't place the prod, go check the history. Praxidicae (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

okay yes, I created two articles DK Films & VJ Clince which were deleted DK films were moved to draft and draft was deleted. about VJ clince is I did not find any previous record before creating the article. and had no idea that the article was created by a blocked user. VJ was made under undisclosed paid contributions. and DK films I created because I liked their videos 👀Chris FredErick ⚽️ Talk ❤️ 20:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * How do you know VJ Clince was deleted for undisclosed paid editing, because the deletion rationale doesn't even say that. Praxidicae (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I write this article under undisclosed paid contributions. I did not found any history before creating the new article. page was never created 👀Chris FredErick ⚽️ Talk ❤️ 20:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC). Yes I did copy signs from User:DBigXray so what? I'm sock of that user too? well here is my final and last message to this conversation. I joined Wikipedia to write articles not fight who I'm I wanted to make some money by writing articles. I searched about writing articles and learned about the policies. read about how to write and what should be in the article. so I have contributed only information which is cited. and if you think I'm a sock of mentioned users, then let it be can't discuss this more. let the admins decide. if you start treating new users like this soon Wikipedia will have no users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisfrederick (talk • contribs) 20:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Clearly you didn't read any policies because paid editing without disclosure is in direct violation of the terms of use. Praxidicae (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Okay, mentioning on the talk page that article that the article is underpaid contributions 👀Chris FredErick ⚽️ Talk ❤️ 20:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

yes I made that comment I thought i was logged in! 👀Chris FredErick ⚽️ Talk ❤️ 20:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Procedural filing per Sockpuppet investigations/Siddiqsazzad001. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Shouldn't you archive this case? Masum Reza 📞 03:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Tagged, closing.. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As per procedure – Clerks should not archive a case they closed. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As per procedure – Clerks should not archive a case they closed. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar username as their previous sock Sudhanshu6454, WP:ACPERM gaming and created Digital Sukoon a company founded by one of their socks. GSS (talk |c|em ) 06:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The crossover with Abhishek4889 socks is not profound, but it's suspicious. . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The suspected sock was registered after was blocked, creating the same kind of promotional articles and recreated Isha Anand Sharma. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 17:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't really care if this is a direct sock or not, but it's clearly paid meat recreation Isha Anand Sharma. They're all over the place with paid editing, including Back To The City Festival and this spammy edit.

I know SPI isn't the place to hash out COIN stuff but it's clear that this is from the same paid spam farm that this master came from. There's also this which is a known UPE target. Praxidicae (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * based on behavioral evidence. Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger  talk   13:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Would a clerk please merge this report with the one below? —  Newslinger  talk   13:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The reports have been merged by . —  Newslinger  talk   06:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The account was created in 2015, last edit was in February 2020 and reappeared today to post Draft:Sudhanshu Kumar the founder of Digital Sukoon created by multiple socks in the farm. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * you blocked RjSherazAhmad as a sock of Anish1121. I'm assuming that means no relation to Abhishek4889, so should I spin this out as a new case?  If so, RjSherazAhmad is the older account, so the sock/master relationship needs to get flipped.  Not sure how to proceed here. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , Abhishek4889 and their socks are stale so I don't have anything to compare to to check for a connection to this SPI - that would need to be based on behaviour). I suspect I left it with Anish1121 as the master they had many more edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Everyone is indef blocked. No sense in leaving this case open at current. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 03:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)