Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishek9779/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New accounts used for restoring same POV on

Removing same content on Censorship in Pakistan.

They have also edited other same articles of different subjects.

There is clear logged out editing in violation of policy. Orientls (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Mazhain is ❌.
 * The remaining accounts are ✅ plus:
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems to be from the same geographical area arguing the same thing about the international status of Durand Line as at Talk:Durand Line. Even the formatting of editing is similar. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * for some reason, this editor reminds me a lot about . Apart from the POV and the geographical area being the same, there are other behavioral similarities in terms of the line of arguments, compulsive socking and block evasion, incomplete understanding of policies and formatting of discussions. Thoughts? Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There are some similarities, though HG is hardly the only Pakistani POV pusher. I am not seeing enough behavioral evidence for me to be comfortable with blocking them. But I agree this is likely an IP sock of somebody. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The IP I pointed out is clearly a sock (in my view) of . You can see their same set of arguments that made on Talk:Durand Line using the same set of sources. My point was that this user aka  and their socks, which are already blocked, look very familiar to Hassan Guy. There are lot of language similarities. They have all used the word "double standard" here,  and  across different IPs but two of those are known to be Hassan Guy. Couple that with the inability to correctly indent their paras or sign off articles makes me very suspicious. I can dig up further ones if you are still unconvinced. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I concur. I've blocked the IP x 1 month. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * IMO we should merge this case-page with Sockpuppet investigations/Hassan Guy since the similarities are uncanny. But this is dependent on what thinks since they have more insight with the CU and other technical details. Maybe they had a good reason to term this as a different case. I am fine either ways but just providing my insight since I am quite familiar with Hassan Guy and also created their LTA page. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Bbb23 didn't "term this as a different case" because I had filed the SPI under "Abhishek9779". I am also aware of Hassan Guy and his IPs however I couldn't discover any behavioral similarities to file it under "Hassan Guy". As of now, Abhishek9779 and Hassan Guy don't overlap and they have made no similar edits. Orientls (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * x 1 month Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same edits on the same set of pages as the sock. Here are two examples and diffs. On Akhtar Mansour, by. On Human rights violations in Balochistan, by. Adamgerber80 (talk) 15:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅

. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These socks of a blocked user have been making disruptive edits to pages such as AQIS and Frontier Corps along with Open Defecation. The IP addresses listed both trace back to Rawalpindi,Pakistan. Mountain157 (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Frontier Corps:

Inter-Services Intelligence:

These IPs are doing nothing except restoring edits of User:Anonymous17771 who was blocked as a sock to this SPI. Ranges are pretty dynamic so I am not sure if a block will work. Maybe the pages should be protected. Rzvas (talk) 10:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm not convinced that this is an attempt to intentionally hop IP addresses in order to cause disruption and abuse. More than half of the IP addresses listed here are from 37.111.128.0/24, and the contributions and WHOIS from that range show me that blocking even just the /24 range is highly likely to result in collateral damage. I think that protection, rather than blocking, is the best solution for situations and articles that are undergoing a high or persistent amount of disruptive editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Putting aside range blocks, which Oshwah already addressed above, the individual IP's edits are too old, some being ridiculously old. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The deleted contributions and the live ones of this IP seemed ducky with Rahataofficial given the removal of the deletion tag. What led me to connect this with Abhishek was this edit by the same IP << FR (mobileUndo) 09:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' This block evader apparently has opened up another account by the name of Ashrafbabur9766. I have noticed that when it comes to Abhishek9779's sockpuppeting he uses the same words and phrases over and over again. These include "ISIS declares Pakistan as enemy", "You are POV pushing","Who the hell is Abhishek9779?", "Discuss at the talk page". Here are some diff's:[],[],[],[],[],[].Mountain157 (talk) 02:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , pinging you in response to User talk:Rahataofficial. &#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  14:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think these related to a pattern of edits to the deleted Rahat Ahmad article on 24 January, but I cannot see the deleted edit history so can add no more detail. AllyD (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * To make things clearer, all I originally requested was a CU to check for links between Rahataofficial to Abhishek9779 since it can be proved per WP:DUCK that both of them used the same IP address while logged out. I don't really have much of a opinion regarding the IP's and editors added by Mountain157. << FR (mobileUndo) 12:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I found 2 more accounts that appear to be sockpuppets of Abhishek9779. The first one is History.lover who has apparently opened up a talk on the page Jaish-ul Adl []. in this particular talk he claims that the person(s) who listed Saudi Arabia and Pakistan should be "banned from further editing", which sounds quite similar to the language used by a confirmed sock of his []. The other one is AayanMRiaz in which he keeps trying to claim that Pakistan was not in support of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces even though the source mentions the Kunduz Airlift along with Pakistani assisted truck evacuation of foreign fighters. Diffs,[],[]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mountain157 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I am going to add another account by the name of Kandahari35 which is engaging in disruptive editing patterns which appear similar to that of previous Abhishek socks,[],[].These sound like WP:DUCK to me.Mountain157 (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Alibaloshi12 appears to be a sockpuppet account of Abhishek9779. I suspect it because the user is editing the same topic area that his other socks edited,(topics related to Balochistan,Iran,Afghanistan and Pakistan) and removal of Pakistan from the allies section of terrorist organizations.Mountain157 (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * On the article Tehrik-e Taliban, 79.69.187.69 is restoring edits made by other potential socks of Abhishek9779,[]. The same sock IP has also made edits on Timeline of Indian history,[] and on Outline of ancient India, where he has also been using another account by the name of Xerxes931, [],[],[].Mountain157 (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I plan to add the account Katoen Natie, since they the user keeps repeating the same thing that because the source is by "Afghans" it can't be used.[][].Another detail I wanted to mention is that this account suddenly edits Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan Province after editing completely unrelated articles such as Bully Dog,and Gull Terrier. I mean I even noticed that originally with Anonymous17771 sockpuppet(which was blocked a while back in December), who suddenly started hounding me.The circumstances sound suspicious to me.Mountain157 (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Katoen Natie, the only user I'm willing to check, is ❌. Closing with no further investigation or action.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per this message, this appears to be a new account created for undoing edits of Mountain157 just like this whole sock farm. Shashank5988 (talk) 18:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

At first he tried to remove content from his Oman's IP and then he registered this new account to remove the content per here.

Shares same interests as this sock farm and also waits for 10 days or so after registering the account, in order to edit the semi-protected articles (example: ).  M L talk 12:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 00:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account dedicated to edit war on same articles as the previous socks. Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Case is stale. Will do behavioural investigation. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:30, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * - Upon behavioural investigation it looks like same user to me. Please indeff the sock. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)