Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Accostapp/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

An IP who is a new contributor focussed almost entirely on preserving the master's Wang sicong. Quack! Cabayi (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The sock's attitude/tone on User talk:Sarahj2107 is very reminiscent of the master's on Articles for deletion/Happn(app) (Special:Diff/743825430). As is their reply below. Cabayi (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * How can you say I'm a sock when there is no proof? You're really stretching here, and I encourage a quick SPI check to end any questions. On the other hand, it's hhilarous to see what faked-moon-landing claim comes next. but I would encourage a quick check, and an end to paranoia.104.163.141.133 (talk) 10:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * this editor has nothing to do with the "master". If you have a close look at the way we write, that would be obvious. I'm an experienced IP user with a router that seems to reset frequently. The master's command of english is poor in the extreme, and I say that for SPI purposes only. No offense intended. Also, if you look at my effort in the article, i have been indeeed focussed on adding very high quality refs, and quality copy. I'm not some dufus sockpuppet. I'm doing good Wiki work here. Anyway, knock yourself out checking things (I encourage you to check!) and have a nice day! 104.163.141.133 (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

There is also overlap in editing at Sobrr. The IP made these edits to the Sobrr article. Zhanglei123456 had previously tagged this article for speedy deletion despite being the one to create the three previous versions that where speedy deleted. The last version Zhanglei123456 created was tagged for deletion as G11 by, who created the current version in an effort to stop the spam. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I took out Google Apps and the Apple App store, as those are BAD references in my view. I guess someone could argue that they are ok, but in my books they are bad refs. Have a nice day. 104.163.141.133 (talk) 11:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * PS I await the moment when someone realizes that Zhanglei123456 is just a well-intentioned editor with a poor command of policy and language, and not some hell-bent spammer. Someoen with expereince should take him/her under their arm and offer some instruction.104.163.141.133 (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I have nothing about this Ip address:104.163.141.133 . it is from canada ,which my account is in china.okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanglei123456 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Removal of WP:CSD templates from multiple articles created by User:Zhanglei123456. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, reverted. Drmies (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * And block on the master extended to indefinite after talk page review. Drmies (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Unblocked the IP, it's definitely not your target. That said, ✅:
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * is the oldest account and I have moved the case; all accounts have been [re-]tagged. I believe these accounts should be re-blocked to indicate they are CU-blocked, but if that's not necessary then whoever reviews this can change the status to closed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. GABgab 21:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same area of editing, Wang Sicong, similar username to previous sock, User:Zhanglei123456, and a brazenly false claim on the userpage, "newbie to wikipedia". Quack! Cabayi (talk) 21:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sock indeffed and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

He admitted on his user page that he created Happn and Wang Sicong which were actually created by User:Zhanglei123456 = User:Accostapp. Timmyshin (talk) 15:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, pages deleted. However, requesting a check for sleepers and against User:ItzTheGreenNinja, who created Draft:IObit. Thanks, GABgab 16:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * in terms of comparing the two accounts. The Ray account is accessing the site using webhosts. (probably as a result). ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. GABgab 02:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreating Tang Yan (CEO), formerly created/deleted as Tang Yan (executive). Same interest as previous socks: Wang Sicong, Momo (software), Draft:IObit, etc. Timmyshin (talk) 09:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Probable undisclosed paid editing, and use of nonstandard symbols in titles of pages they've created suggests they may be copying and pasting from another website. Plus all the overlap. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)