Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Account10000/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Tried to remove sock tag on User:Account20000, see filter log Jerm (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Seconded. Very similar behaviour to the last three accounts, including changing the tense of games removed from sale to past-tense, despite the VG MOS establishing the opposite. Of particular interest is DragonVale, which was only temporarily removed from sale and is currently available, yet the user keeps changing it to past-tense. Also pinging, who dealt with the puppeteer before. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 16:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same behaviour, same scope. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 16:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing per above. Sro23 (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obligatory, but Account10000 has a grudge against and myself for repeatedly identifying his disruptive editing. The account is already blocked but should be tagged appropriately. Sleepers and IP range should possibly be checked. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 06:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Username similarities and also in Special:AbuseLog/28811593, Account30000 tried to remove the sock tag in User:AidenPearcetheHacker's userpage. – Sub  way  22:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Already blocked. Tagged. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK per scope and name. Requesting CU again for sleepers. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 05:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Just stop with the sockpuppet investigation. I will delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Account40000 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Everything in the archive is stale, so no point in CU. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Logging for the record, ~TNT (she/her • talk) 00:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.'''
 * is very to .  &  ~TNT (she/her • talk) 00:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * See also my comments here (permalink). Based on that, going to mark as proven to Account10000 through behavioral connection to Enwiki~enwiki.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * And marking master as confirmed, and in fact 3X-banned based on past CUblocks by Yamla at Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Account10000. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

TL(alt) declares itself on the user page to be a new account of, a CU confirmed sock. Cabayi (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I assume this is being filed for the record. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The documentation on this case is rather muddled. I've been meaning to file a big pro forma for a while but haven't gotten around to it. For now: -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 16:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Questionable redirects, often involving memes, cf.
 * Penises   (cf.          and username "Penii") and other body parts
 * Interest in old Wikipedia history (cf. ) and similar weirdness like this warning to an established user who hasn't edited in 2 years.
 * General trolling, e.g.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * If this isn't A10k it's someone, but I'm pretty sure it's A10k. . --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 16:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * came up when I looked at - they're confirmed, and I will block/tag. Lallint geolocates to the same general region of the same country, but there isn't anything specific in the logs that connects them to the other accounts.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Girth Summit did you intend to tag Piracy is No Party? -- RoySmith (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oops - yes, done, thanks. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing any strong evidence to tie Lallint to A10k. Sadly, acting out a juvenile body part fetish is fairly common behavior, so that's not enough to pin a sock tag on without something more specific. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I haven't looked closely at the behaviour, but I'm inclined to agree with you. I suspect that this is someone quite young who is doing some things because they think they're funny. Girth Summit  (blether)  20:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)