Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Account activity/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

One edit] two years ago, which immediately reverted. Suddenly reactivates today to repeat the same edit. Not itself inherently bad. But then immediately jumps into the same edit dispute, with the same language and behavior as, complete with the same inability to read or engage in counter arguments, same obstinate WP:TE behavior, and same unwillingness to open a talk page discussion until reverted multiple times. Especially for a wording that has been stable and previously discussed at WT:BASEBALL. In short, a duck quacking into a megaphone. But, since there's no public IP address, check user is requested. oknazevad (talk) 04:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I changed the spelling of the master's name (lower case "a" in "activity" instead of upper case). I'm 99% certain that's whom you mean, but please confirm it.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Blocked master one month on behavioral evidence. Blocked puppet indefinitely. --Neil N  talk to me 15:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Found a third puppet . All three are, of course, ✅. Courcelles (talk) 03:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've also changed the block to indef. With two puppets five years, and one two, a month isn't going to do anything. Courcelles (talk) 03:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)