Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Accredited/Archive

Evidence submitted by Nableezy
Since Accredited had performed two reverts on United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 an IP comes and performs the exact same revert another two times. The IP in his edit summary says that the quotes removed are "self-contradictory" with Accredited calling them "inconsistent". Other IPs have been used that locate to the same location with the same ISP also making the same edits as Accredited such as 79.181.58.119, 79.177.101.19 and 79.179.124.209. Powder Hound 3000 only edits have been to re-revert edits of Accredited that have been reverted by others.  nableezy  - 17:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Nableezy 17:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

. The IPs are probably socks based on behaviorial evidence, but a check on the named account and also, which I just added per and , could be helpful. Timotheus Canens (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

=.

appears ❌. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't think the behavioral evidence is convincing enough (when looking at the edits) for me to conclude that the two likely ones are socks of each other. I'll leave this open for others to look at if need be. –MuZemike 19:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I, too, remain unconvinced, especially given the large gaps in time. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 23:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)