Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aceuswa/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both suspected socks have made edits similar to the suspected master account on the same article as the suspected master. WP:DUCK Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comment - Article being edited is Joe Nguyen Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Aceuswa, Asianskc, Aquaa7sc, and Kanqiu are CU-confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs) 23:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like Drmies ran a checkuser and confirmed these. I'll update the status.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I had to run out on an emergency--beer, queso, enchiladas, etc. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Drmies - I completely understand the urgency for the food and beer. ;-) No problem - always happy to lend a hand. Enjoy!  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not seeing an account named . GeneralNotability (talk) 02:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked Aceuswa a week for using socks to edit-war, indeffed the confirmed socks, Justice left alone. Holding on close pending the Aquaa user comment being sorted out. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops, GeneralNotability: . Thanks. Drmies (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, bagged them. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, bagged them. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See their talk; continued aspersions against. Obvious WP:NOTHERE. Firestar464 (talk) 10:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)



Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This is quite embarrassing on my part. I was not aware of the SPI despite it being on their userpage. They have also filed frivolous SPI and Edit Warring reports. Scorpions13256 (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

The claim that Justice1980==Aceuswa is false. Only because Justice1980 agreed with Aceuswa and disagreed with SounderBruce, does not justify the accusation that the Justice1980==Aceuswa. Will Wikipedia stay neutral and unbiased and draw its conclusion based on evidences not cult inflences? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justice1980 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Let's do a comparison of SounderBruce vs. Firestar464. Please explain the 1 minute apart edit between the two. [] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justice1980 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yep, continued edit-warring over the same content (e.g. ), attacks on the same users, including socking accusations . Quack quack. – please up the master's block to indefinite and block the sock indefinitely as well.  Did you check Justice1980 at the time? --Blablubbs&#124;talk 16:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I've closed the SPI (it's how I found this one) and dropped a note at ANEW – for what it's worth, I don't think there's anything to be embarassed about here. :) --Blablubbs&#124;talk 16:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Blablubbs, geolocation makes it possible but I can't block on that alone. It will have to be done from behavior. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have blocked Justice1980 as NOTHERE. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Leaving this open for now – I think a reblock for socking is a good idea. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 08:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not think this is a sock. CU and off-wiki evidence indicates MEAT. I think that keeping Justice1980 blocked for NOTHERE is fine, and that the one week block to Aceuswa for MEAT is fine. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , could you forward the off-wiki evidence to me? Given that they immediately continued the socking allegation crusade of the master (as opposed to just continuing the edit war, which is what I would expect if this was some Twitter canvassing thing or similar), these two individuals would probably have to be fairly closely related. Even if it is meat, I still think the master's block should be upgraded – someone who runs 4 accounts and recruits others to edit war over problematic content should probably have to prove that they're here to build an encyclopaedia before they're allowed to continue editing. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 15:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Can't share the evidence on this one. But I am totally fine if someone wants to upgrade to indef on Acewusa for NOTHERE. The socking, the meat recruiting, the behavior, the bad attitude, the pov pushing, not reassuring. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 16:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Acewusa indeffed as NOTHERE. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)