Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Achmednut321/Archive

23 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The aforementioned users have blatantly similar usernames (except for Achmednut321). They also have similar userpages (including Achmednut321). They've also been behaving in a similar fashion while editing List of Regular Show episodes (see history). King-9 (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

IMPORTANT UPDATE (PLEASE READ): Please click here. Achmednut321 and Mordecai4444 claim to be different people, saying they are friends. Though Mordecai4444 admitted that he used Mordecai2222 and Mordecai3333 to create a "fake [TV] series". Mordecai4444 claims he meant no harm. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm not sure if he/they is telling the truth, or if he/they is lying, or if he/they is playing mind games. Though, I do think this investigation should go on, but I have some requests for the following circumstances: --King-9 (talk) 23:42, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If Mordecai2222, Mordecai4444, Mordecai3333, and Achmednut321 turn out to be one and the same person, then ban all of the accounts (though leave one of the accounts unbanned, with a warning).
 * If Achmednut321 and Mordecai turn out to be two different people, then do not ban Achmednut321 for certain. As for Mordecai, ban all of his accounts (though leave one of the accounts unbanned, with a warning).

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I've blocked the two Moredcai socks, and am endorsing for clarification on the other, as well as sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the lot. No sleepers, but the technical connections here are beyond question, the same IP's, the same user agents, and the same edit times. Of course, I can't tell who was sitting at the keyboard at any particular moment, but there's no technical difference ewhatsoever between these accounts. Courcelles 03:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Achmednut321 is the oldest account, so I've changed this case to show that as the master. And I've blocked and tagged the rest. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

29 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

A new account created a day after the blocking of editor Achmednut321. In the edit history of their user page, the editor was in preparation of creating an episode list for a non existent show. A practice of Achmednut and their socks. Sarujo (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's.. possible, I guess? CU for confirmation. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jclemens (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

26 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

- making the same harassing edits to User:Sarujo. All users are blocked, but I think a sleeper check and confirmation is in order. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All of the above are ✅ plus and . . Courcelles 20:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)