Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Acreativename123/Archive

Evidence submitted by Shakehandsman
Dubious nature of the username in terms of sockpuppetry is fairly self explanatory as in it implies the user has operated previous accounts.

User:Acreativename123 repeatedly added unsourced / original research to three sections of the article Football records in England, replacing legitimate sourced data in the process: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_records_in_England&diff=prev&oldid=346740807

I would undo such edits, yet he would revert back to the Original research version by undoing my three edits: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_records_in_England&diff=prev&oldid=352353594

User:Acreativename123 edited few other articles than this one, and was eventually banned for vandalism. User:Lookicantthinkofanymorenames is now making the exact same three reverts as User:Acreativename.

I believe such behaviour combined with the very dubious username and similar editing style means the two accounts are almost certainly the very same person.--Shakehandsman (talk) 03:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -, no CU necessary. T. Canens (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked indef. T. Canens (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)