Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Actionjackson09/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline1 2• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These users are causing stress and removing my sourced edits by calling these are not notable. Here are evidences:
 * 1) First this user removes this edit, then again reverts it and after user was reported to AE and discussion opens then suddenly IP tags me in talk page that there is policy that non-English sources can't be used. And suddenly, ThaNDman224 reverts my edit.
 * 2) Just see the talk page of Morari Bapu. Their opinions are similar and they never respond back query and start removing content from another account and open another discussion.
 * 3) See their behaviour on talk page of Swaminarayan. Almost, identical.
 * 4) Whenever there is discussion related to Swaminarayan Sampraday and particularly, criticism or edit then all comes on the way.
 * 5) See this template removal, I objected it and then suddenly appolo reinstanted it.
 * 6) Check their edit summaries on the page Akshar Darshan. This is identical.
 * 7) The account of NDNman became active to remove informations from Akshar Dham New Jersy while Actionjackson was working on same article. See this. This can't be coincidence.
 * 8) NDNman and Actionjackson Both have user name which are based on Hindi movie.
 * 9) And similarly, they never had conflict with each other and their comments on talk pages of Talk:BAPS, Talk:Swaminarayan Sampraday, Talk:Morari Bapu. They never object each other's comment and behaving like duck. One starts discussion, other supports it, another removes content from article. They are contributing on same area and never had to revert each other's edit. Isn't it strange? And when it comes to criticism of Swaminarayan then all of the accounts suddenly come on the page like it happened to completely unrelated person Morari Bapu. After 3O, they started calling person who gave opinion as semantic and all. Never responded from same account again.

Most probably, this is sockfarm and my guess is more accounts may be connected by looking at their behaiours. Ergo I am requesting checkuser evidences.  Harshil want to talk? 16:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ❌. Checkuser is  for &mdash;insufficient evidence demonstrating sock puppetry. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)