Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Active Banana/Archive

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
I don't have any usernames that may be his sockpuppets, but I believe that he is a sockpuppet of a previously blocked user, most likely to be a "wikinazi" as they say. He only joined WIkipedia for only about a month ago, and his earlier and most edits are warnings and blocking threats to users. If he really is a newbie, he wouldn't easily know this stuff. He acts as if he was already using Wikipedia for years. There won't be any harm done if we check right?....--TwelveOz (talk) 10:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by TwelveOz (talk) 02:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Moved from WP:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Active Banana and merged duplicate reports -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Please indicate (1) what socks you believe are related to User:Active Banana and (2) what evidence you have supporting that claim (and why you think a checkuser is necessary). Thanks! -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 02:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

frivolous report. Active Banana's first edits didn't show an advanced understanding of wikipedia and saying they might be "a wikinazi" indicates that this is a bad-faith report. Please also note that the filer of this case had edited legitimately as an IP before registering an account, during which time they were warned by Active Banana. SpitfireTally-ho! 11:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)