Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adhan24/Archive

Evidence submitted by Mikemikev
An Arbcom case is in progress regarding Race related issues. Adhan24 popped up in the last few days and has started making some pretty extreme POV edits, possibly as a form of provocation. It may just be a new user, who I will be happy to give some guidance to, but would appreciate confimation. The listed 'socks' are established users which I believe Adnan24 may be a sock of. mikemikev (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

This frivolous and disruptive request has been included as evidence in the ArbCom case. Mathsci (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * You are going to need a lot more than "they edit the same topic area" to justify a CheckUser being ran, let alone any blocks being issued. This to me looks like a bad faith attempt to get back at those who have disagreed with you. Tiptoety  talk 03:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh? How would a check user be a way to 'get back' at someone if they were innocent? I'm not trying to get back at anyone. But do as you will. mikemikev (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't see any strong behavioral connection in any case, certainly not nearly enough to DUCK by (and I really don't think that there is enough evidence to Checkuser by, but it's not my call to make.). NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 17:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - This is bordering on . There's no behavioral evidence to support this socking, and without a clear sockmaster, CU is invalid here. CU is for finding socks of a sockmaster, not the other way around. ( X! ·  talk )  · @784  · 17:49, 24 July 2010 (UTC)