Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adiagr/Archive

26 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These users have been writing a blatantly opinionated book summary at Invading the Sacred that does not distinguish between fact, author's opinion, and outright slander. All but the suspected sockpuppeteer are SPAs. I'm not quick to jump to SPI, but in this case, I'm not engaging in discussion with a group of clearly biased editors without knowing whether it's really a group or just a single person. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These are all very the same user, or a group of closely related editors. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Socks blocked and tagged. Master blocked for two weeks. Marking for close. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)