Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdirondackMan/Archive

Report date April 24 2009, 22:21 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

See this discussion. Editor has apparently been using various socks to get himself listed at WP:MISS. The editing styles of the different IPs are pretty similar. The disruption began here and has continued on and off until now. After the various IPs (masquerading as different people) did not get their way, they made various threats. Earlier contact is here. At least there were no threats, I guess. Anyway, the discussion at Acalamari's page just about covers it.  Enigma msg  22:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by User:Enigmaman


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by  Enigma msg  22:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * To confirm link to the account listed (which, I'll admit, seems obvious) and to determine the potential for a rangeblock. Other notes: the IP has been threatening legal action, Acalamari has been dealing with blocking the IPs (and initially did not see a need for CU), was referred to SPI by clerk Kanonkas who believes a check is warranted. Nathan  T (formerly Avruch) 22:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅, is a probable sleeper. --  lucasbfr  talk 11:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Peter Symonds ( talk ) 15:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Tagged the sleeper. All other accounts/IPs blocked. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 15:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Looks good. Archiving.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  16:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date May 21 2009, 15:24 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

These are evidently sockpuppets of Adirondackman and were blocked as such. Considering the socking continues, I believe another checkuser is warranted.  Enigma msg  15:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Enigmaman
 * One more thing. Scientizzle evidently believes AdirondackMan is the sock of another user. I'm not sure if this is accurate. Can anyone comment as to the veracity of this?  Enigma msg  15:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by  Enigma msg  15:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Although the users and IPs have been blocked, it would beneficial to know if the accounts are related to ESCStudent774441, as Scientizzle believes. Icestorm815 •  Talk  18:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Listed socks and IPs confirmed.
 * User:ESCStudent774441 is stale
 * User:ESCStudent774441 is stale
 * User:ESCStudent774441 is stale

-- Avi (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC) nothing more to do here Mayalld (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)