Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adnanjavidkhan1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Users having the same editing pattern. See the attached links.

https://interaction-timeline.toolforge.org/?wiki=enwiki&user=ArticleBaker&user=Akaybroda

https://interaction-timeline.toolforge.org/?wiki=enwiki&user=ArticleBaker&user=Adnanjavidkhan1 CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

User Adnanjavidkhan1 and ArticleBaker was banned at Wikidata for being a promo-only account. CrystallineLeMonde 23:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

The IPv6 addresses are taken from Wikidata, where they've been active.--CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC) The commonswiki CU report confirmed Adnanjavidkhan1 as Articlebaker1. --CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 23:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' ArticleBaker, Akaybroda and are  on Wikidata. The master is stale there so I'd appreciate it if English Wikipedia CU's could share their data on them with me (privately, of course).--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Articlebaker1 = Adnanjavidkhan1. Based on the rest I have blocked the accounts. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Seeing as the IPV6's (or their /64) haven't made any edits here, I'm leaving them unblocked for now. Otherwise Amanda has done the mopping.  CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account created shortly after last puppet of puppeteer was blocked. And one of the first edits after creating was to submit an article for review which had been draftified due to it being created by socks of the puppeteer. See their contribution history and this edit. When the article was declined at AfC, they simply moved it into mainspace.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -- RoySmith (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Similiar username to Adnanjavidkhan1, plus editing at Draft:Sakett Saawhney -- Amanda (she/her)  10:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and locked. -- Amanda (she/her)  10:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

They are all editing in the same area, creating same kind of promotional articles, using identical language in edit summaries such as "moved to live space" when moving pages from the draft namespace, and endorsing each other's actions. For instance, User Tintantuckle created Ayaan Khan (actor), which was nominated for deletion, and user Shivangi1738 contested the deletion with a. After the page was deleted, user Supercat9906 recreated it on Simple Wikipedia under Ayaan Khan (now deleted).

In September last year, user Shivangi1738 created Pavleen Gujral, which was also nominated for deletion and this time user Supercat9906 contested the deletion with a.

On September 1st, user Tintantuckle from a page they created. Later, user Theroadislong tagged the page with undisclosed paid, prompting user Shivangi1738 to start on September 9th. User Supercat9906 then finally.

On September 2nd, user Supercat9906 created a promotional article. A few days later, user Shivangi1738 uploaded file:Javid Parsa.jpg as their own work and incorporated it into the article, raising further concerns about their connection. Their editing activity appears to be limited to creating or editing pages, often mentioning being hired. I highly suspect they belong to a sockfarm and engage in undisclosed paid editing, given the selection of their article subjects. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Based on behavioral evidence, there's no doubt these are sockpuppets. Blocking and tagging. Marking for Clerk attention, as the real master is Adnanjavidkhan1 so this needs to be merged into that case. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Done. P.S.,, I was able to figure out what you meant, but it's helpful to explain the rationale for a merge for lazy people like me... Spicy (talk) 23:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Noted, I'm not sure I've ever met anyone lazier than me before. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
The suspected sock was registered a few days after previous socks were blocked, made a few edits today to become autoconfirmed, and then moved Draft:Lewis Raymond Taylor to the main namespace, as well as removed the undisclosed paid editing tag. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 09:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I have observed some behavioral similarities between KyuAurKaise and Tintantuckle that suggest they may be the same individual, and I am willing to share further details privately. Pinging, who handled this SPI last month. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Im not paid to edit neither am I sockpuppet, and you are completely ignoring the statement regarding undisclosed paid editing and unblock request created by Tintantuckle the page draft:Lewis Raymond Taylor has to be restored to main space as it is notable and may only require a small clean up, considering everything else you are ignoring GSS it seems you personally do not want the page to stay in mainspace despite its notable and UPE hasn't been an issue as per the Tintaktuckle. admin should do the needful in this matter and consider the statement of user too as he has given good valid reasons to address accusations which I personally think. Thank you KyuAurKaise (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account has been by . Closing this report. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)