Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Againstcensorship/Archive

17 June 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Repeated addition of unsourced original material with claims of rape having occurred at this location.
 * Evidence submitted by Fæ (talk)
 * diff
 * diff
 * diff. Fæ (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

In my opinion, this doesn't even need a SPI. Clearly the same user, originally blocked because they were editwarring and inserting their own website into the article. Whatisthecgtryingtohide is currently blocked for 3RR on the article listed above, after reinserting the text. Their current manifestation is slightly better than before, since before they were just a spammer and now they at least have 1 reliable source...even if it doesn't actually say anything about the crime other than it might have happened. Username is a concern, but not sure enough to block them just based on that. Syrthiss (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

This is pretty clearly block evasion by Againstcensorship. I've tagged the other two accounts as socks (being newer). Everyone has been or is now blocked indef. Please move this page to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Againstcensorship. Thanks. TN X Man 16:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Moved from Sockpuppet investigations/Whatisthecgtryingtohide.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 19:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)