Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ajaxverifier/Archive

18 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This began with Ajaxverifier putting a 'code of practice' or 'manifest' at Talk:Cornwall. Britanniabackbone then changed Cornwall  (note this seems to be from someone's userspace) on 19:52, 17 November 2013. That was reverted by Cluebot, reinstated by Britanniabackbone, reverted again. Oakbulwark replaced the material, was reverted, and the material was added again by Esktorrent. As these are obvious sock or meatpuppets, the article was protected. Dougweller (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * A bit of a sockfarm. ✅ are:


 * is
 * NativeForeigner Talk 18:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * NativeForeigner Talk 18:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Master and all socks blocked indef per technical, and in the case of VeryLargeCommercialTransport, behavioral evidence. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

20 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blindingly-obvious sock. Same article. Same edit. Same edit summary. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious duck blocked indef and article protected. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)