Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ajdkj/Archive

28 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This edit summary and this comment. Either meat'ing or sock'ing. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU isn't necessary here. Per behavioral evidence I've blocked Colcarey. Uhggnn was already blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

03 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * (Recently blocked 48 hours for edit warring, has notably seem to have stopped using this account when the suspected socking began)
 * (Blocked indefinitely, but including here in order to determine if tagging is appropriate)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

All of these have made personal attacks accusing others of being Nazis. Lipsdaily and the IP seem to be the most related as they both made personal attacks on my talk page, both almost exactly a day apart, in the time before 1am. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - There might be a connection between the two accounts, but Fountainviewkid and the IP seem unrelated to the group (behavoirally) and to themselves (behavoirally). Am I missing something? -- DQ  (t)   (e)  02:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the IP should be removed then, as I thought that that user also made the same kind of personal attack. I have been receiving quite a couple of these, like (see the revdeleted edit on my talk page that user made). What concerned me though was the fact that these occured within almost exactly a day of each other, both less than an hour after midnight UTC.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Removed 68.34.207.23.  EBE123  talkContribs 20:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * - Wait...maybe the IP...Endorsing for a check on & . Would like a sleeper check per talk page history and requestors comments. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  21:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Errr, I don't see the behavioral link between and the others.  pending further evidence.
 * seems to be ❌ to and al.
 * -- Luk  talk 08:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Both are blocked anyway. as I said before I think is unrelated. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  16:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

17 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (blocked 3 hours for edit warring)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Similar disruption on List of indigenous peoples Jasper Deng (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ as each other:



Ajdkj and Charmholds are Grawp, along with umpteen other socks whom I will not mention here. Some IPs blocked, along with an open proxy or two. –MuZemike 00:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * What is Grawp?Jasper Deng (talk) 00:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Jasper: an exceedingly prolific socker; see Long-term abuse/JarlaxleArtemis. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)