Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AkramBinWallid/Archive

17 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Contributions JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 19:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Same complaints as [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=482360375 AkramBinWallid], who was edit-warring at Talk:Republic of China over the removal of support !votes. GotR Talk 19:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * More quacking from GJJ. GotR Talk 19:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Account blocked indefinitely on account of the quacking. Please feel free to lengthen the block on Akram. Drmies (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the same are: Socks are indef blocked, master is at this point only blocked for edit warring, I'll leave it to someone else to decide whether there's a future of constructive, collaborative editing here. Amalthea 21:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

17 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Only contribs are in an ANI after being blocked. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Was RachelGandy123 until blocked. Based on serious quacking and amazing continuity in conversations from "different" users.  Dennis Brown (talk) 22:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' As AndyTheGrump points out, single purpose account getting involved out of nowhere in complete support for one of AkramBinWallid's other sockpuppets, RachelGandy123. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ of course. Had been created by the time I got to the noticeboard to comment ... In light of that, the block of the master account is now indef. Amalthea 22:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)