Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshata Sen/Archive

22 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Re-creation of a previously speedy-deleted (autobiographical) article with the same content. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two named accounts are ✅ matches. TN X Man 14:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * tagged and blocked; marking as closed. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 15:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

02 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts are being used for promotional purposes. IP welcomed sock1 with the name of "Akshata Sen" Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Another sock, Akshata Dev, was blocked after an SPI in July. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Block evasion. Materialscientist blocked "Tanushri Sen" today, who, along with an IP, is a sockpuppet of "Akshata Sen" and "Akshata Dev". Have to have rangeblock over here Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Here we go. The following are ✅ matches to each other:
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not convinced on the IP, and autoblocks did not hit the IP. The boat was blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

27 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The original account was used for creating hoax articles with invalid references. The article Anushka Sen created by User:Daminy seems to be a hoax as well. -  Managerarc   ™ talk  18:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Probably, but endorsing to confirm. There were a lot of sleepers last time, so let's see if those can be found too. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll call this one ✅, while encouraging someone to take another look, as the range is very busy. Courcelles 20:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * There is also a bit of anonymous IP spamming of the same nature. Not sure if a rangeblock is a good idea, either. –MuZemike 20:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

04 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User created another hoax article Anushka Mukherjee. Is it possible to put a rangeblock on the 182.178 ip? -  Managerarc   ™ talk  09:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing to confirm. Based on what Muzemike said last time, we may not be able to do a rangeblock here. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ Range is in too much use for a rangeblock. -- Avi (talk) 14:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

05 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New SPA 17any created twice Anushka Mukherji, speedy deleted and retagged for speedy, and removed speedy tag. IPs removed speedy tags. RacconishTk 08:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC) RacconishTk 08:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This isn't really a sockpuppet, it is just the user's IPs editing the page.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  11:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree this is a fringe case. Nevertheless, there is a pattern of making the problematic edits under IP. RacconishTk 11:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. How can this be sanctioned?  Rcsprinter  (talk)  11:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Warn and salt maybe? RacconishTk 11:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, that seems feasible.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  12:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've merged the 17any case into this one; it's clearly Akshata Sen. I've also salted the Mukherjee article. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I've also blocked 17any and the two IPs. We're done for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

10 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account used for creating hoax article Roshni Mukherjee. -  Managerarc   ™ talk  12:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU is unnecessary here; I've blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

13 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Dimple Mukherjee -  Managerarc   ™ talk  15:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
A match to, who was previously blocked as a sock. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, deleted. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

15 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same type of fake article with fake refs. Sleeper check would be appreciated, as also the possibility of pouring a load of cement on the IP range if feasible. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No apparent sleepers and a rangeblock is, unfortunately, not possible due to the high collateral. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Already blocked and tagged, so marking for close, see you tomorrow.&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

16 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

We meet again today. Sleeper check please. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Block the ducks on sight, and request CU only where there is ambiguity. AGK  [</nowikI>&bull; ] 12:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * last sleeper check was day before this was filed, little point in doing another now. Many thanks for reporting, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)