Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlMichaels1727/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Firestar464 (talk) 10:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Isn't that ? Firestar464 (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for filing here, . Yeah, I guess means that the technical evidence is—cool word!—posslikely; behaviorally, the odds on a new account finding their way to a a blocked user of two weeks' standing and making that their first and only edit must be a million to one. Thanks both!  ——  Serial  11:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Firestar464 - I consider the technical evidence I have to be higher than just "possible", but lower than "likely", though I am leaning more toward the direction of "likely", if that helps any... :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Same country and relative geolocation. Different ranges, but same OS in user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * – in view of this signed confession. Favonian (talk) 14:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Alibino was previously OmegySock log an alternate of . Alibino is seeking to change name m:Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/73815/. Cabayi (talk) 16:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Requesting CU as both this and the Alibino account were created within the last couple of weeks. Ao quote myself, behaviorally, the odds on a new account finding their way to a blocked user of two weeks' standing [and trolling it]... must be a million to one.. —— Serial  14:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Between 2000-01-01 and 2021-02-25 on en.wikipedia.org User:AlMichaels1727 (talk | contribs) and User:ItzJustLucky (talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser. Firestar464 (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I was patrolling recent changes and was just seeing the recent edit on the blocked users talk page and reading. That's all. ItzJustLucky (userpage) (talk) (fighting) 12:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you also commented there. Firestar464 (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Different, but somewhat-close geolocations, same OS from user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Looks the same person to me. Cabayi (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Cabayi (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 14:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Per, these accounts above are all ✅ at loginwiki, except for Bcarter and WassupFromBritain, who are ; the confirmed ones are already locked. Some were never locally attached and are listed for completeness. Martin thinks that a local check on enwiki might uncover more, hence per steward – please look for other accounts. Not tagging yet pending CU outcome. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 14:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Confirming this comment :). Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Also noting the not (yet) attached given their helpful admission here. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 15:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I think we got all the accounts—I didn't find any that hadn't been blocked or globally locked. 2v5 and Puyomino are ✅ to previous AlMichaels1727 socks. Although Bcarter20098922 and WassupFromBritian are theoretically possible, personally I think it's (the underlying IP seems to be quite static, not dynamic, and while Bcarter and Wassup are on the same range, they are not on the same static IP). Because of the lack of behavioral evidence connecting Bcarter20098922 and WassupFromBritian to the other accounts, I would presume for the time being that they are not related. The remaining accounts have no data on enwiki because, as noted, they are not attached here.  If you want, you can add tags for 2v5 and Puyomino, but other than that, it doesn't seem like any further action is needed here. Mz7 (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the check. Leaving the two unlikely ones alone. for the others because I get the feeling that AlMichaels1727 would like those. Closing. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 09:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * per below. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged based on significant technical evidence. Though the previous cases are stale, I can see from the logs that the Lopbunny69 account is editing with the exact IP associated with the AlMichaels1727 accounts. A behavioural check against shows an obvious overlap. --  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)