Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albaredd/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets





 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user commented just one time in a talk about Alberto Areddu, real name of Albaredd and https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:PedroGunner, a sockpuppet banned from italian wikipedia. He called me "PP" as he called me in the past

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paleo-Sardinian_language#On_the_Areddu_controversy

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PedroPistolas&oldid=1049720740 https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Albaredd PedroPistolas (talk) 11:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Update: another user, Bancali77, commented referencing Albaredd's legal action against me and linking a document made by Areddu that had just 1 view before I opened it.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Although I can see the dots that the filer connects, it's a bit thin, and TommasoBom has made only one edit. I also noticed that another new user, also made one edit on the article Talk page that was very close to a legal threat. For both reasons, a CU would be helpful to confirm one or both of these users. (While I was writing this, Bancali77, whose first edit was reverted by another user, reinstated their edit, which I've just reverted.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * - legal threats made by Albaredd and the very close legal threat by Bancali77 towards the same user suggests sockpuppetry. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * along with and  are ✅. Separately  and  are ✅. These two groups are separate either due to spoofing or using two different computers. However, these two groups are  to ✅ to each other. Both groups use a similar busy dynamic range so additional accounts may be found at a later date (especially for the second group). Although the IPs in this case are pretty dynamic, I used a combination of technical evidence with any edits they made to filter out any unrelated users. I'm pretty confident, with comparison of some edits, that all the accounts listed above in my comment are in the same group. Any CU is free to ask questions or discuss with me about my findings. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagging all as CU confirmed and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  08:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)