Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albertolajofen/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The sole purpose of these accounts appears to be to create an article about a non-notable foundation. See contribution histories for the quacking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Albertolajofen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pete1985 Robert McClenon (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * It appears that only administrators can now view and compare the histories to verify that the exact same words were used in the three submissions, two by the now-blocked (for name violation) master and one by the sock, because the two submissions by the master have been speedy-deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this.  was "soft blocked" and advised to create new account (see User_talk:Albertolajofen). We can't advise a user to create new account and then block them for doing exactly that.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * User:Vanjagenije - If the new account was created after the user was told to create the new account, then that is a special case. Okay.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)